Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

DB Access in UT: False Positive #513

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 3, 2021
Merged

DB Access in UT: False Positive #513

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 3, 2021

Conversation

lucasborin
Copy link
Member

There was a false-positive when you scan multiple objects, like from a correction request. Technically, local objects with the same name were causing conflict in the buffer and the Check wasn't able to identify if the class was using a framework.

@lucasborin lucasborin requested a review from a team as a code owner November 3, 2021 17:02
@lucasborin lucasborin merged commit f9cd107 into 1.16.1 Nov 3, 2021
@lucasborin lucasborin deleted the db_access_false_positve branch November 3, 2021 17:05
@lucasborin lucasborin mentioned this pull request Nov 3, 2021
Merged
lucasborin added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2021
@lucasborin
1.16.1 (#512)
240b567 
* changelog + version

* DB Access in UT: False Positive (#513)

* fixing false positive

* changelog

Co-authored-by: Lucas Borin <5233413+lucasborin@users.noreply.github.co>

Co-authored-by: Lucas Borin <5233413+lucasborin@users.noreply.github.co>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@lucasborin